Evaluating the Social and Psychological Effects of Space Travel on Human Society: The Mars Colonization Perspective
Abstract views: 132 / PDF downloads: 44
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13863684Keywords:
Indoor sociology, Indoor psychology, Space sociology, Colonization of Mars, Human mission to Mars, Social effects of settling on Mars, Space travelAbstract
This article delves into intriguing subjects of the future, such as space exploration and the colonization of Mars. With the growing interest in space travel among humans, it becomes imperative to evaluate Mars’s potential for human settlement and to study the social and psychological repercussions of such colonization. The research offers a sociological and psychological perspective to comprehend the impacts of space travel on human society. It covers the potential effects of colonization on Mars on social dynamics, encompassing topics like social structure, cultural shifts, and human relationships. Additionally, it focuses on the psychological ramifications of long-term space travel, including factors such as isolation, stress, and human adaptation. This article furnishes crucial insights for planning future space missions and understanding the process of acclimatizing human society to space exploration. The colonization of Mars epitomizes humanity’s desire to explore space and expand its horizons. Nevertheless, the social and psychological effects of this monumental leap can imprint a profound and intricate mark on human society. This article scrutinizes pivotal aspects of this impending transformation by addressing the potential futuristic, sociological, and intellectual implications of Mars colonization. Firstly, the colonization of Mars may foster a sense of unity among people around a common goal. Venturing to an extraterrestrial planet and inhabiting it could be perceived as a collective objective of humanity, potentially strengthening social cohesion. This could facilitate a more harmonious approach to global issues and promote international collaboration. Secondly, Mars colonization has the potential to engender a novel social structure and class dynamics in human society. Colony settlements may evolve unique models of self-sufficiency and resource-sharing, thereby impacting social inequalities. Consequently, it may be imperative to formulate preemptive policies and regulations to establish a fair social system. Thirdly, voyages to Mars and prolonged habitation could significantly affect individuals’ psychological well-being. Challenges such as long-term isolation, constrained resources, and a sense of remoteness may induce psychological stress and adaptation challenges. Hence, providing psychological support and counseling services becomes pivotal for sustaining the mental well-being of colonists. Mars presents an intriguing prospect for human colonization on various fronts. Its geological structure bears resemblance to Earth, suggesting the presence of underground resources, minerals, and water that could sustain human settlements. Discoveries of ice and water traces on Mars imply enhanced accessibility to water resources for settlements. Moreover, the water’s hydrogen and oxygen components hold potential for fuel production. Although Mars’s climate markedly differs from Earth’s, its thin and cold atmosphere can be leveraged. Carbon dioxide in the atmosphere could facilitate vegetation growth, while creating a greenhouse effect could elevate the planet’s temperature. Advancements in technology for sending humans to Mars are steadily progressing, thanks to the concerted efforts of space agencies and private entities. This allows for better technical preparations for Mars colonization. Mars stands as a focal point of interest for scientists due to its geological, climatic, and historical features, which offer vital insights into Earth’s past and the universe’s formation. However, overcoming technical, financial, and physical obstacles remains imperative to realize the goal of human colonization. There are several compelling reasons driving human aspirations to settle on Mars. It provides an avenue for humanity to explore space and expand into uncharted territories, aligning with our innate desire for exploration. The exploration and colonization of planets like Mars are crucial for enhancing humans’ ability to inhabit extraterrestrial environments. Moreover, Mars, with its potentially Earth-like conditions, contributes to humanity’s endeavor to expand interplanetary life. Concerns such as natural disasters and climate change on Earth might be propelling individuals to seek settlements on Mars as a contingency plan for the future. Furthermore, Mars’s significance extends beyond mere exploration; its geology, climate, and history offer invaluable insights into Earth’s history and the universe’s formation. Additionally, the presence of water and other resources on Mars holds promise for supporting life beyond Earth. Hence, space exploration and colonization are integral to humanity’s future trajectory, with settling on Mars representing a stride toward ensuring long-term human existence in space and ultimately facilitating the dissemination of humanity across the cosmos.
References
Alfano, C. A., Bower, J. L., Cowie, J., Lau, S., & Simpson, R. J. (2018). Long-duration space exploration and emotional health: recommendations for conceptualizing and evaluating risk. Acta Astronautica, 142, 289-299.
Campion, N. (2016). The moral philosophy of space travel: A Historical Review. Commercial Space Exploration: Ethics, Policy and Governance, 9-22.
Carbajales-Dale, M., & Murphy, T. W. (2023). The environmental and moral implications of human space travel. Science of The Total Environment, 856, 159-222.
Cohen, E., & Spector, S. (2020). Transhumanism and cosmic travel. Tourism Recreation Research, 45(2), 176-184.
Collins, D. L. (2003). Psychological issues relevant to astronaut selection for long-duration space flight: a review of the literature. Journal of Human Performance in Extreme Environments, 7(1), 1. DOI: 10.7771/2327-2937.1021.
Dickens, P. (2019). Social relations, space travel, and the body of the astronaut. In Space Tourism (Vol. 25, pp. 203-222). Emerald Publishing Limited.
Flather, C. H., Hayward, G. D., Beissinger, S. R., & Stephens, P. A. (2011). Minimum viable populations: is there a ‘magic number’for conservation practitioners?. Trends in ecology & evolution, 26(6), 307-316.
Fomina, E. V., Lysova, N. Y., Kukoba, T. B., Grishin, A. P., & Kornienko, M. B. (2017). One-year mission on ISS is a step towards interplanetary missions. Aerospace Medicine and Human Performance, 88(12), 1094-1099.
Fong, MD, Kevin (February 12, 2014). “The Strange, Deadly Effects Mars Would Have on Your Body”. Erişim adresi: https://www.wired.com/2014/02/happens-body-mars/ (10.02.2024).
Gangale, T., & Dudley-Rowley, M. (2006). The Social Construction of Time on Mars Results of Martian Time Survey v1. 0 and v2. 0-2.2 Compared. In Space 2006 (p. 7490).
Gethmann, C. F. (2006). Manned space travel as a cultural mission. Poiesis & Praxis, 4, 239-252.
Hecht, M. H. (2002). “Metastability of Liquid Water on Mars”. Icarus. 156 (2): 373–386.
Heyl, J. S. (2005). The long-term future of space travel. Physical Review D, 72(10), 107-302.
Ihle, E. C., Ritsher, J. B., & Kanas, N. (2006). Positive psychological outcomes of spaceflight: an empirical study. Aviation, space, and environmental medicine, 77(2), 93-101.
Kanas, N. (1990). Psychological, psychiatric, and interpersonal aspects of long-duration space missions. Journal of spacecraft and rockets, 27(5), 457-463.
Kanon, E. (2016). How Space Travel Will Save the World: An Anthropocentric View of Sustainability. Commercial Space Exploration: Ethics, Policy and Governance, 35-46.
Keating, A.; Goncalves, P. (November 2012). “The impact of Mars geological evolution in high energy ionizing radiation environment through time”. Planetary and Space Science – Eslevier. 72 (1): 70–77.
Krittanawong, C., Singh, N. K., Scheuring, R. A., Urquieta, E., Bershad, E. M., Macaulay, T. R., ... & Crucian, B. E. (2022). Human health during space travel: state-of-the-art review. Cells, 12(1), 40.
Langston, S. M. (2016). Space travel: risk, ethics, and governance in commercial human spaceflight. New Space, 4(2), 83-97.
Launius, R. D., & McCurdy, H. E. (2007). Robots and humans in space flight: Technology, evolution, and interplanetary travel. Technology in Society, 29(3), 271-282.
Levchenko, I., Xu, S., Mazouffre, S., Keidar, M., & Bazaka, K. (2021). Mars colonization: beyond getting there. Terraforming Mars, 73-98.
Mars Academy. (2001). “Can Life exist on Mars?” Erişim adresi: http://library.thinkquest.org/12145/lifeon.htm (06.02.2024).
Musk, Elon. (2022). “Elon Musk: Mars’ta ‘kendi kendine yeten’ bir şehir inşa etmek istiyorum”. Erişim adresi: https://www.ntv.com.tr/dunya/elon-musk-marsta-kendi-kendine-yeten-bir-sehir-insa-etmek-istiyorum,4hqzdtrYp0mkVSn9Ct_D-Q (14.02.2024).
NASA. (2004). “Mars Mice”. Erişim adresi: science.nasa.gov. (10.02.2024).
Salotti, Jean-Marc. (2020). “Minimum number of Settlers for Survival on Another planet”. Nature. Scientific Reports (1): 9700.
Sherouk, Zakaria. (2017). UAE’s Mars 2117 is put in action. Erişim adresi: https://www.khaleejtimes.com/news/general/uaes-mars-2117-is-put-in-action (12.02.2024).
Smith, P. H. (2011). Digging mars. Scientific American, 305(5), 46-54.
Smith, S. M., Abrams, S. A., Davis-Street, J. E., Heer, M., O’Brien, K. O., Wastney, M. E., & Zwart, S. R. (2014). Fifty years of human space travel: implications for bone and calcium research. Annual review of nutrition, 34, 377-400.
Spencer, Keith A. (May 2, 2017). “Keep the Red Planet Red”. Erişim adresi https://jacobin.com/2017/02/mars-elon-musk-space-exploration-nasa-colonization (14.02.2024).
The Guardian. (2017). Mars covered in toxic chemicals that can wipe out living organisms, tests reveal. Erişim adresi: https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/jul/06/mars-covered-in-toxic-chemicals-that-can-wipe-out-living-organisms-tests-reveal (05.02.2024).
Tickle, Glen (March 5, 2015). “A Look Into Whether Humans Should Try to Colonize Venus Instead of Mars”. Erişim adresi https://laughingsquid.com/a-look-into-whether-humans-should-try-to-colonize-venus-instead-of-mars/ (12.02.2024).
Verseux, Cyprien; Baqué, Mickael; Lehto, Kirsi; de Vera, Jean-Pierre P.; et al. (August 3, 2015). “Sustainable life support on Mars – the potential roles of cyanobacteria”. International Journal of Astrobiology. 15 (1): 65–92.
Whitehouse, David (July 15, 2004). “Dr. David Whitehouse – Ammonia on Mars could mean life”. Erişim adresi: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/3896335.stm (08.02.2024).
Zubrin, Robert M.; McKay, Christopher P. (2006). “Technological Requirements for Terraforming Mars”. Erişim adresi: http://www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~mfogg/zubrin.htm (13.02.2024).
Zubrin, Robert. (1996). The Case for Mars: The Plan to Settle the Red Planet and Why We Must. Erişim adresi: https://archive.org/details/caseformarsplant00zubr (14.02.2024).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Tanım Tenkit Teori
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.