Hasan Al-Basri’s Views on the Friday Prayer
Hasan-ı Basri
Abstract views: 0
/ 
PDF downloads: 0
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18895646Keywords:
Figh, Friday Prayer, Ijtihad, Obligation, Hasan-ı BasriAbstract
The aim of this study is to identify the views of Hasan-ı Basrî regarding the Friday prayer (Jumu‘ah) and its related conditions, to present the evidences upon which these views are based, and to determine the historical context of the relevant debates. In this way, both the character of religious thought during the Tābiʿūn period and the manner in which legal issues were addressed in that era will be better understood. The study will also examine how Hasan al-Basrī’s evaluations were received in later literature and to what extent they influenced the formation of contemporary juristic opinions. In this respect, the study is not limited to a purely historical description but also takes into account the continuity of the issue within the scholarly tradition. In Islamic society, the Friday prayer holds a special position in terms of preserving religious continuity and ensuring social cohesion. Through this weekly congregational prayer, the community gathers at a designated time; religious, moral, and social matters are conveyed through the sermon (khutbah); and thus public consciousness is kept alive. In this sense, the Friday prayer transcends being merely an individual act of worship and acquires an institutional character. Its outcomes-such as strengthening social relations, transmitting religious knowledge, and practicing faith on a shared communal basis-have made it a central element sustaining continuity within Muslim societies. The obligation of the Friday prayer is established by the Qur’an, the Sunnah, and consensus (ijmāʿ), and there is no disagreement among Muslims concerning its obligatory nature. The Qur’an commands believers to leave trade when the call to prayer is made on Friday; the Prophet maintained this practice throughout his lifetime; and the Companions continued it as an integral part of the social order. Although there is agreement regarding its obligatory status, certain juristic debates have arisen concerning the conditions required for the validity of this act of worship and the scope of those conditions. Issues such as upon whom it is obligatory, under what circumstances it is valid, the essential elements of the sermon, its relationship to the noon (ẓuhr) prayer, and the spatial dimension of the prayer have been among the primary areas of disagreement among the legal schools. This situation is noteworthy in that it demonstrates the ijtihād-based nature of Islamic legal thought and the presence of interpretive diversity even in matters of worship. Within these discussions, the views of Hasan al-Basrī-one of the prominent scholars of the Tābiʿūn generation—occupy a distinctive place. His evaluations of the Friday prayer are significant both in terms of the evidences he employed and the way his opinions were perceived by later scholars. This reflects the dynamic structure of early Islamic jurisprudence and shows that diverse legal interpretations could coexist within the same period. In order to assess Hasan al-Basrî’s approach to this issue more accurately, a comparative method will be followed, taking into consideration the positions of the other legal schools.
References
Abdürrezzâk, E. B. b. H. S. (1983). el-Musannef. Thk. Habibürrahmân el-A’zâmî, Beyrut:Mektebetü’l-İslâmî.
Absî, A. B. A. b. M. b. A. Ş. (1989). el-Kitâbu’l-Musannef fi’l-Ehâdîs ve’l-Âsâr. Thk. Kemal Yusuf el-Hût, Lübnan: Dâru’t-Tâc.
Avcı, F. (2025). “Fakihlerin hadislerdeki hükümlerin umumîliği ve hususîliğini tespit kriterleri”. Rize İlahiyat Dergisi 29 (Ekim 2025), 165-181. https://doi.org/10.32950/rid.1727500
Aynî, M. b. A. (T.y.). Umdetü’l-Kârî Şerhu Sahîhi’l-Buhârî. Dâru İhyâi’t-Turâsi’l-Arabî.
Aynî, M. b. A. (2000). el-Binâye Şerhu’l-Hidâye. Thk. Eymen Salih Şaban, Beyrut: Dâru’l-Kütübi’l-İlmiyye.
Diyanet İşleri Başkanlığı. (T.y.) Din İşleri Yüksek Kurulu. https://kurul.diyanet.gov.tr
Ebû Dâvud es-Sicistânî. (2009). Sünenü Ebî Dâvûd. Thk. Şuayb Arnavud, Beyrut: Dâru’r-Risâleti’l-Âlemiyye.
Ebû Dâvud et-Tayâlisî. (1999). Mesnedü Ebî Dâvud et-Tayâlisî. Thk. Abdulmuhsin et-Türkî, Kahire: Dâru Hicr.
Ezdî, S. b. el-H. (1984). Müsnedü Ömer b. Abdilazîz. Dımaşk: Müessesetü Ulûmi’l-Kur’ân.
Hererî, Y. b. H. (h. 1315). Şerhu Süneni İbn Mâce. Karataşî: Kadîmî Kütübhane.
İbn Ebî Şeybe, E. B. A. b. İ. B. O. (1979). el-Musannef. Thk. Abdulhâlik el-Afganî, Hindistan: Darü’l-selefiyye.
İbn Hazm, E. M. A. b. A. (1984). el-Muhallâ. Y.y.: Matbaatü’l-İmam.
İbn Kudâme, M. (h. 1338). el-Muğnî. Beyrut: Darü’l-kütübü’l-ilmiyye.
İbn Mâce, E. A. M. b. Y. (h. 1431), Sünenü İbn Mâce, Thk. Muhammed Fuad, Halep: Dâru İhyâ-i’l-Kütübi’l-Arabiyyi.
İbn Manzûr, M. b. M. (1993). Lisânü’l-Arab. Beyrut: Dâru Sâdır.
İbnü’l-Müzhirî, H b. M. (2012). el-Mefâtîhu fî Şerhı’l-Mesâbîh. Yy.: Dâru’n-Nevâdir.
Kal’acî, M. R. (1996). Mevsûatü fıkhi Hasan el-Basrî. Dâru’n-Nefâis.
Kâsânî, A. b. M. (h. 1328). Bedâiu’s-Sanâiʿ fî Tertîbi’ş-Şerâi’. Kahire: Şirketü’l-Matbûâti’l-İlmiyye.
Karaman, H. (1993). “Cuma”. Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı İslâm Ansiklopedisi. İstanbul: TDV Yayınları.
Kutrub, M. b. el-M. (1985). el-Ezmine ve Telbiyetu’l-Câhiliyye. Thk. Hatim Salih ed-Damîn, Beyrut: Müessesetü’r-Risâle.
Malik b. Enes. (1994). el-Müdevvene. Dâru’l-Kütübi’l-İlmiyye.
Mâtürîdî, M. b. M. b. M. (2005). Te’vîlâtü Ehli’s-Sünne. Thk. Mecdi Baslum, Beyrut: Dâru’l-Kütübi’l-İlmiyye.
Mâverdî, A. b. M. (1999). el-Hâvî’l-Kebîr fî Fıkhi’l-Mezheb İmam eş-Şâfiî. Thk. Ali Muhammed Muavvad& Adil Ahmed Abdulmevcûd, Beyrut: Dârü’l-Kütübi’l-İlmiyye.
Nesefî, E. A. b. M.(1998). Tefsîru’n-Nesefî. Thk. Yusuf Ali, Beyrut: Dâru’l-Kalem
Nevevî, Y. b. Ş. (1991). Ravdatu’t-Tâlibîn ve Umdetu’l-Müftîn. Beyrut: el-Mektebü’l-İslâmî.
Nevevî. (h. 1344-1347). el-Mecmûʿ Şerhu’l-Mühezzeb. Kahire: Matbaatü’l-Taḍâmüni’l-Ehavî.
Nîsâbûrî, A. B. M. b. İ. (1985). el-Evsât fî’s-Sünen ve’l-İcma‘ ve’l-İhtilâf. Thk. Ebû Hamid Ahmed b. Muhammed, Riyad: Dâru Tayyibe.
Nîsâbûrî. (2004). el-İşrâf alâ Mezâhibi’l-Ulemâ. Thk. Ahmed el-Ensârî, Birleşik Arap Emirlikleri: Mektebetü Mekketi’s-Sekâfiyye.
Ruveynî, E. (2009). Bahru’l-Mezheb. Thk. Tarık Fethi, Beyrut: Dâru’l-Kütübi’l-İlmiyye.
Serahsî, M. b. A. b. E. S. (1985). el-Mebsût. Kahire: Matbaatü’s-Seâda.
Sübkî, M. M. H. (1977). ed-Dînü’l-Hâlis ev İrşâdü’l-Halk ilâ Dîni’l-Hakk. Thk. Emin Mahmud Hattâb, Kahire: el-Mektebetü’l-Mahmûdiyye es-Sükkîyye.
Şâfiî, S. E. H. Ö. b. A. (2008). et-Tavdîh li Şerhi Câmiʿi’s-Sahîh. Dımaşk: Dâru’n-Nevâdir.
Şevkânî, M. b. A. (1994). Fethu’l-Kadîr. Dımaşk: Dâru İbn Kesîr.
Tahtâvî, A. b. M. (1970). Hâşiye alâ Marâki’l-Felâh alâ Nûri’l-Îdâh. Kahire: Matbaatu’l-Halebî.
Tahtâvî, A. b. M. b. İ. (1997). Hâşiyetü’t-Tahtâvî alâ Merâki’l-Felâh Şerhu Nûri’l-Îdâh. Thk. Muhammed Abdulaziz el-Halidî, Beyrut: Dâru’l-Kütübi’l-İlmiyye.
Tenûhî, E. S. A. b. S. b. H. (1924). el-Müdevvenetü’l-Kübrâ. Suudetü’l-Arabiyye: Matbaatü’s-Saade.
Tîbî, Ş. (2013). Futûhu’l-gayb fi’l-keşf ʿan kinâi’r-rayb. Dubai: Uluslararası Kur’ân-ı Kerîm Ödülü Yayınları.
Zeylaî, O. b. A. (1896). Tebyînü’l-Hakâik Şerhu Kenzü’d-Dekâik. Kahire: el-Matbaatü’l-Kübrâ.
Vellavî, M. b. A. b. A. b. M (h. 1416-1424). Şerhü Seneni’l-Nesâî’l-Müsammâ Zahîretü’l-Ukbâ fî Şerhi’l-Müctebâ. Riyad: Dâru’l-Mi‘râci’l-Düveliyye.
Vellavî, (2015). Bahru’l-Muhît. Riyad: Dâru İbni’l-Cevzî.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Tanım Tenkit Teori
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
